Bernhard Zipfel

University Curator of Fossil and Rock Collections

One small step: A review of Plio-Pleistocene hominin foot evolution.


Journal article


J. DeSilva, E. McNutt, J. Benoit, B. Zipfel
American journal of physical anthropology, 2019

Semantic Scholar DOI PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
DeSilva, J., McNutt, E., Benoit, J., & Zipfel, B. (2019). One small step: A review of Plio-Pleistocene hominin foot evolution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
DeSilva, J., E. McNutt, J. Benoit, and B. Zipfel. “One Small Step: A Review of Plio-Pleistocene Hominin Foot Evolution.” American journal of physical anthropology (2019).


MLA   Click to copy
DeSilva, J., et al. “One Small Step: A Review of Plio-Pleistocene Hominin Foot Evolution.” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2019.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{j2019a,
  title = {One small step: A review of Plio-Pleistocene hominin foot evolution.},
  year = {2019},
  journal = {American journal of physical anthropology},
  author = {DeSilva, J. and McNutt, E. and Benoit, J. and Zipfel, B.}
}

Abstract

Bipedalism is a hallmark of being human and the human foot is modified to reflect this unique form of locomotion. Leonardo da Vinci is credited with calling the human foot "a masterpiece of engineering and a work of art." However, a scientific approach to human origins has revealed that our feet are products of a long, evolutionary history in which a mobile, grasping organ has been converted into a propulsive structure adapted for the rigors of bipedal locomotion. Reconstructing the evolutionary history of foot anatomy benefits from a fossil record; yet, prior to 1960, the only hominin foot bones recovered were from Neandertals. Even into the 1990s, the human foot fossil record consisted mostly of fragmentary remains. However, in the last two decades, the human foot fossil record has quadrupled, and these new discoveries have fostered fresh new perspectives on how our feet evolved. In this review, we document anatomical differences between extant ape and human foot bones, and comprehensively examine the hominin foot fossil record. Additionally, we take a novel approach and conduct a cladistics analysis on foot fossils (n = 19 taxa; n = 80 characters), and find strong evidence for mosaic evolution of the foot, and a variety of anatomically and functionally distinct foot forms as bipedal locomotion evolved.


Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in